>>2741117>if the Fallout series continued on an isometric path,that'd have to be underrail.
I love the wasteland series, and in spite of Brian Fargo's involvement, I think he's more trying to copy todd's fallout than improve the original formula
>who would you choose, /vrpg/ anons?angela is what happens when you let your ambition preach louder than your reasoning. you get rid of the patriarch, then what are you gonna do about the other gangs and refugees that keep pouring in. by the time she's dealt with them all, rangers won't have enough food or ammo for themselves lets alone the HQ back in arizona. as for the patriarch side,
his kids arent a real threat,patriarch i just an old man clutching onto his throne as hard as he can because he knows that none of his kids are fit to rule it. some have diplomacy, while others have the strength and with, but neither of them has all cards to play. That's why each child is either controlling or getting manipulated by one gang or the other instead of being on top of it all, like the patriarch
who bought peace at a low price. I went the boring route and sided with the old man but in all honesty, if given the choice...
I'd take liberty's offer. a tomboy gf that wants to rule the wastes? who tf turns that offer down?